|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Final Report of the
Presented
at the Caribbean Labour Market Information Conference "Producing and disseminating labour market
information and Regional integration processes in the Caribbean” 17-19 October 2004 Cascadia Hotel and Conference
Centre Trinidad and Tobago Prepared by:
Reynold Simons, CLMIS Project
Director and Senior Specialist, Employment and Labour Market Polices & Aurora
Noguera-Devers, CLMIS Project Coordinator 1. Background
In September 2001, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) signed an agreement with the Unites States Department of Labor (US-DOL) to implement the Caribbean Labour Market Information System (CLMIS) Project. The project aimed at achieving more effective labour, employment and labour market policies in the Caribbean that would be responsive to the new challenges of regional and hemispheric integration and globalization by generating reliable, timely and internationally comparable Labour Market Information (LMI), at the national, regional and international levels. The immediate objectives of the project were: (i)
In the participating countries the
national labor market information systems are structured by establishing an
institutional framework and the adopting of a national short term LMI plan and
these systems are improved by an increase in the availability and quality of
timely labor market information crucial for policy formulation of governments,
trade unions and employers.
(ii)
Six countries in a
pilot group will have enhanced and more efficient dissemination and analytical
capability of national and international LMI through an electronic nationally
based LMIL that is part of a global LMIL.
From areas of where countries had decided to take
action the project sought to achieve these objectives by implementing the
following ten (10) project activities:
1. An update of the National Classification of Occupations (NCO) in three (3) Caribbean countries and fusing these into a draft regional classification. 2. An evaluation of the potential of the National Insurance Schemes (NIS) to serve as a scource of LMI on formal sector employment in six (6) countries. 3. Set up national institutional framework for LMI and adoption of national LMI plans in six (6) participating countries. 4. The establishment of Occupational Wage Surveys (OWS) and Labour Force Surveys (LFS) in three (3) in participating countries. 5. The enhancement of Occupational Wage Surveys (OWS) and Labour Force Surveys (LFS) in six (6) participating countries. 6. Produce the Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM) Productivity Indicators (PI) for manufacturing and tourism sectors in six (6) participating countries. 7. Design and implement software and instructions to adapt the format of the ILO Subregional Office data set to the (Caribbean) Labour Market Information Library (C-LMIL) and restructure the data collection to facilitate updates quarterly and semi-annually. 8. Establish country specific (national) Labour Market Information Libraries (N-LMIL) in six (6) countries. 9. "Train the Trainers" seminar on Creating trained users of LMI amongst employers and trade unions. 10. Conduct 1st Caribbean Conference on LMI standards and guidelines to adopt a set of core regional standards for labour statistics. 2.
Strategy
for Implementation
In getting the project started, initial structures were put in place to facilitate project implementation. These included: -
Establishing the project
organization. The project office was established and project staff
recruited. - The establishing the tripartite project advisory committee (PAC) with representatives from the Ministries of Labour, the national Statistics Office, the Caribbean Employers Confederation (CEC), Caribbean Congress of Labour (CCL), CARICOM Secretariat, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (UNECLAC) and the International Labour Organization Subregional Office for the Caribbean. The purpose of the PAC is to provide advice to the ILO as the program implementing agency, and assist in the promotion of project activities, outreach, and facilitation and in providing other project implementation support. - Formal enrolment of countries in project activities and mandating lead agencies for each activity. This formal enrollment included formalizing commitment and ensuring participation in project activities. This involved conducting a teleconference to refine project areas and to illicit enrollment as well as missions to each participating country to explain the project and to initiate activities nationally. - The establishing national tripartite LMI committees to guide the implementation of the activities. - The establishing national focal points in each country to ensure the coordination and integration of LMI activities nationally. - Signing a contract with the lead agencies implementing the activity. The project was basically designed to provide technical assistance and limited support for implementation. It was also assumed that the respective lead agencies had decided to undertake the activity without completely depending on international funding for implementation and sustainability. Initially the project was designed to be implemented by a core set of National Consultants with guidance from International Specialists and various national technical teams and stakeholder groups. Due to the requests by national lead agencies to strengthen lead agency capacity building and promote regional collaboration the project management took the decision to allow national specialists employed by the lead agencies to be released to serve as the National Specialists for the project activities as in kind input by the lead agency. Although this decision tended to promote greater ownership of the project outputs, greater participation by the key agencies responsible, and institutional strengthening, this decision had a large impact on the project’s administration including the implementation schedule.
Figure 1 Table 1: Percentage of National Specialists Provided by Lead Agencies (in-kind)
As a result, as indicated in Table 1 above, in approximately eighty percent (80%) of the activities, the technical assistance structure involved the linking of International Specialists with National Specialists assigned by the lead agency involved, guided by national technical teams and tripartite committees, and coordinated by project management at the ILO Subregional Office in Port of Spain, Trinidad. 3. Project Results Overall the project has been able to meet most of its objectives and targets. Table 2 below demonstrates the project objectives and the results achieved to date.
In terms of cost, the following table represents the total amount spent per activity, (excluding management costs):
4.
Lessons Learnt During project implementation the project experienced various challenges. Various attempts were made to mitigate these challenges during the course of implementation. These challenges included: 1) At the level of Project Management: a) Resource constraints: From the size of the project that is the number of countries and the number of activities it becomes clear that the allocated budget was very tight. This resulted in various constraints including the available technology, staff and other technical expertise. b) Communication:
The project design relied heavily on telecommunication facilities to link the
international specialists with the national specialists. Inadequacies of the
telecommunication infrastructure in the region posed a challenge especially in
the area of video conferencing. c) The
formalization procedures the project adopted involved initiating new procedures
within the ILO administration. Sometimes this resulted in delays d) Determining
the final group of participants in each activity. 2) At the national level: a) The attrition rate of personnel serving as focal points for purposes of communication and reporting was higher than expected in some countries. Consequently, progress in setting up an LMI institutional framework met with mixed success. b) Some of the national stakeholders were unaware of what was happening with the project on the national level. c) Attrition rates for national specialists were also high and this adversely affected the transfer of knowledge from experts, as well as completion of planned activities within the agreed time frame. Having the implementation of an activity “rest in the hands” of National Specialists employed by lead agencies. These lead agencies tend to be small with limited resources. As a result, there are competing priorities for the time and resources of these offices and their officers. The national specialists employed by the lead agency usually had a different pace than private consultants. d) Ensuring that the lead agency is aware of the progress and supports the work of the National Specialists. 3) Delivery of technical assistance a) Some of the International Specialists were not available as planned. b) Both national and international specialists were unable to deliver their products within the agreed time frame. As the work had to done in a synchronized way this usually impacted on the timeline of the project. Late production of deliverables by the national staff was usually due to other pressing activities and commitments. Recommendations: 4) At the level of Project Management: a) To avoid resource constraints project budgets should better reflect the need for project implementation infrastructure and staff. b) Critical communication facilities assumed in the project design should be made explicit in the project design and budgeted for separately in the project budget. c) All procedures for formalizing participation in project activities must be prepared and agreed with the parties involved during the start up phase of the project to avoid delays during implementation. d) A system of competitive assessment should be designed to determine the final group of participants in each activity if the target number of participants is exceeded. 5) At the national level: a) National agencies should assign a back up person for each position that is critical to project implementation to minimize the impact of attrition. b) At the national level a parallel system to the quarterly technical reports could be instituted to monitor project implementation and facilitate communication and coordination at the national level. 6) Delivery of technical assistance a) The International Specialists must be contracted well in advance of the commencement of the activities and a system of backup consultants should be considered in cases where specialists are not available. b) In the quarterly reports recommended earlier, the lead agencies should report on the availability of specialists they made available to the project during that period. This will allow the project management to assess the type of problem that caused delayed delivery of outputs. . 5.
Recommendations for follow
up Based on the challenges confronted in Caribbean Labour Markets, the state of the labour market information systems in the region and the lessons learned the CLMIS project management recommends the following follow up for the CLMIS project. 1) LMI Assessments/Plan: With the experience gained and the assessment tool developed the LMI assessments can be taken by countries on a periodic basis. This will allow countries to assess progress made in the development of their LMIS. The ILO Subregional Office for the Caribbean will make the upgraded assessment tool available on its website which will allow countries to take the assessment and get their database and a set of standard tables immediately. All other tools developed to prepare a national LMI plan will also be made available on the website. 2) National and Regional Classifications of Occupations: In brief a regional platform of custodians should take the role of coordinating collaboration and activities in this area to ensure continuity. Informal talks between the custodians of classifications of occupations involved[15] have resulted in the decision to have the Caribbean Occupational Information Exchange Facility (COIEF) take charge of the products produced by the CLMIS. The COIEF will also be the initial platform for communication and collaboration between the partners. 3) LMI Standard Setting meetings every three years: The region should meet with a frequency of three to four years to discuss labour market regional information standards which are becoming increasingly relevant with the processes of regional and hemispheric integration. 4) Productivity indicators are extremely important in the analysis of the global competitiveness of the Caribbean economies. The series established in the five countries should be institutionalized and updated regularly (annually). However, to ensure continuity, quality and analysis of the indicators as well as to allow other countries to develop the indicators a Caribbean Center for Productivity Studies is needed. Project document is being developed. 5) Labour Force and Wage Surveys: Countries are urged to continue to periodically evaluate and enhance their LFS and WS as information needs and situations are continuously changing. The ILO will continue to provide technical support to this effect. The working paper produced by the CLMIS project containing the methodological information on the surveys established or enhanced will be published with a certain periodicity, probably every three years. As such it will become a reference document on LFS and WS but it will also reflect the regions development in this area. 6) Administrative databases. The CLMIS project evaluated the National Insurance Schemes in the region as a potential source of additional labour market information, particularly in countries that do not have the ability to pay for an extensive and frequent household survey programme to monitor labour market indicators. This evaluation was aimed at identifying differences between the concepts and methods used in producing these data and data produced specifically for statistical purposes by statistical offices and other agencies. As a follow up the CLMIS project management recommends that: a. A project is developed to implement the recommendations of the national reports of the countries that participated in the evaluation. b. The tools developed for this evaluation are made available on the website of the ILO Subregional Office for the Caribbean. This will allow countries that did not participate in this activity to undertake the evaluation. The ILO could make technical assistance available to countries undertaking this evaluation. 7) Data dissemination: In the CLMIS Project two data dissemination projects were delivered: a. The labour market information dataset that is available on the ILO Subregional Office for the Caribbean website was restructured. The information is now available as a Caribbean Labour Market Information Library. This format is much more user friendly and allows easy cross reference between countries. In addition the classification and categories used are standardized for the region. b. Six national labour market information libraries. These libraries are specifically designed for national use and provide a link with the regional library. The software allows for a sub-national level. c. The follow up for data dissemination consists of: i. Keeping both the Caribbean and the National libraries updated will provide national, regional and international users with an up to date set of key indicators of the Caribbean labour markets. ii. Extending the Non-employment tables in the Caribbean Labour Market Information Library. iii. Including the data for the sub-national level of the national libraries and further customization of the libraries to satisfy national needs. iv. Further updating of the metadata in the system 8) Trade Union (TU) and Employers Organisations’ (EO) modules Implementation of the modules at the national level will require funding and some technical assistance. A project is now being written find funding to provide this assistance. [1] For the following sectors: garages, information technology, ________ [2] Levels ________ [3] For the following sectors: Information Technology, Energy ________ [4] Bahamas, Barbados, Netherlands Antilles, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago. [5] Barbados, Grenada, Jamaica and the Netherlands Antilles [6] St. Lucia and the Bahamas [7] St. Kitts and Nevis [8] Barbados, Cayman Islands, Dominica, Guyana, [9] Antigua and Barbuda, Jamaica, Netherlands Antilles, and Trinidad and Tobago [10] "Survey designs for Occupational Wage Surveys in the Caribbean" and "Survey designs for Labour Force Surveys in the Caribbean" [11] Bahamas, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and the Netherlands Antilles [12] Barbados, Grenada, Jamaica, St. Lucia and Trinidad and Tobago [13] Barbados, Jamaica, St. Lucia and Trinidad and Tobago [14] Barbados, Grenada, Jamaica, Netherlands Antilles, St. Lucia and Trinidad and Tobago [15] The custodians involved were the Ministry of Labour and Social Security in Barbados custodian or the BARSOC, STATIN the custodian of the JASOC, the Ministry of Education in Trinidad and Tobago custodian of the TTDOT and the ILO custodian of the ISCO. It was decided to formally ask the CARICOM secretariat to participate fully in the COEIF considering its expected role in developing and maintaining a regional classification of occupations |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Designed and Maintained by |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||