|
||
C A R I B B E A N C O M M U N I T Y S
E C R E T A R I A T
TWENTY-NINTH MEETING OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE OF
CARIBBEAN STATISTICIANS SCCS/2004/29/13 Hamilton, Bermuda 22-24 November 2004 16 November 2004
PROPOSED COLLABORATION BETWEEN CARICOM SECRETARIAT AND
THE UNSD IN THE COMPILATION OF INFORMATION FOR THE DEMOGRAPHIC
YEARBOOK
Introduction
All Directors of Statistical Offices of the Region are quite familiar with the UNSD's Annual Demographic Yearbook (DYB) and the questionnaires that are used to put this publication together. Especially for small offices like ours in the Region, the instrument for collecting demographic and social data can be quite overwhelming. However, at a recent review of the DYB, the UNSD reported that this flagship publication is one of the most used publications of all released by the UNSD. It is crucial therefore, that attempts are made to increase the response rate. In an effort to do this, the review made several recommendations to both the format and content of the DYB. The UNSD is currently implementing these recommendations. The Regional
Response to the DYB
Even though a formal inventory has not yet been
carried out, it is known that most Member States of the Region do respond to
the questionnaires of the DYB as far as the available data permit. Member States are also being asked to
complete and return requests for social data and indicators under the CARICOM
programme. If the requested information
is the same, it would be undesirable for them to send the same information to
the two agencies. Surely a smooth
arrangement can be worked out such that Member States send the data only to the
regional agency which can then distribute this globally. However, while there are common areas of data
collection for both the DYB and the CARICOM Programme (population, live births,
deaths and infant deaths), it must be noted that the level of details required
for the DYB, is much more demanding.
While the CARICOM Programme might be collecting a particular statistic
that is required for the DYB, for example, live births by sex, the level of
details required for the DYB questionnaire for this particular indicator is by
all the following variables: -
month; -
legitimacy status; -
live-birth order; -
born in wedlock by duration of
marriage; -
age of mother and sex of
child; -
born in wedlock by age of
mother and sex of child; -
age of father; -
born in wedlock by age of
father; -
age of mother and live birth
order; -
birth-weight; -
gestational age; and -
type of birth. This situation, which also applies to data on adult
and infant deaths, would make the joint collaborative efforts and data sharing
very difficult. In fact, presently, it
is not even clear if Member States are compiling these indicators at this level
of detail. The Need for
Capacity Building within Member States
Ideally, rather than requesting data at the Member
States level, it would be much more efficient if the requests can be addressed
at the regional level. In fact, this is
the ultimate plan with respect to all branches of statistics, since this is a
much more cost effective and efficient approach. Currently, the Trade Statistics may be the only set of statistics
that have reached this level. Once this
capacity is built at the regional level, the Secretariat becomes a one-stop
repository of all Member States' statistics and the user can therefore more
easily gather whatever is required at one central location rather than have to
make requests to individual countries. For us to operate at this more efficient level
however, there is need for significant improvements in Member States' capacity
to generate the required statistics at the national level, in the first
place. Currently, considerable gaps and
deficiencies remain in Member States' capacity to collect and compile many of
the key social statistics that are often required by users. Therefore, for the success of any meaningful
collaboration to fulfill the requirements of the DYB, of urgent priority is the
need to fully develop the capacities of the various Member States. In fact, even if the status quo continues,
without enhancing the capacity of Member States, there will always be large
gaps in the data supplied by Member States for use in the DYB. Conclusion
Undoubtedly, there is need for the UNSD to conduct
its own internal review/revision of the DYB questionnaire. Based on the conclusions of the DYB meeting,
this process has evidently commenced.
An approach to collaborate with the Region can comprise the following: (i)
There is need to look
closely at the CARICOM Region not only at the overall response to the DYB
questionnaire, but also the responses for the individual sections and variables
within the questionnaire; (ii)
Based on the initial
exploratory work to establish areas of commonality between the CARICOM
Programme and the DYB, there is further need to evaluate the gap that exists
between both programmes in order to access if there are efficiency gains or
alleviation of respondents burden from utilization of a joint approach; (iii)
There is need to
ascertain whether the additional details that form the gap between the CARICOM
Programme and the DYB are being collected in Member States, the sources of that
data and info on the metadata; (iv)
An enhancement of the
capacity building required at the national level will be vital. Obviously, sometimes requests for data that are
simply not available will not tend to demand results, the Secretariat through
its CARICOM Programme has worked in outreach programmes in Member States aided
by the UNSD/CARICOM Project and .. by the ... and World Bank and ... The CARICOM Programme is focusing on building
capacity through facilitating greater outer agency coordination is Social
Activities. Once an appropriate examination of the DYB process can be
undertaken in the Region, the Secretariat stands ready to support the
collaborative trust. ****** |
||
Designed and Maintained by |
||